Laura Bush, five years ago: “I was the librarian who spent 12 hours a day in the library, yet somehow I met George.”
June 2010
The Ego and Its Own
And in that regard, I guess I’m back to my original 14-year-old assertion that there’s no such thing as a selfless act. It is my brain, after all, that’s telling me what to do. But I think there is actually something different and more complex going on. Because the way it feels, when my back is hurting as I carry the kid up on the elevator and into our apartment, it’s almost as if it’s not my brain telling me what to do. It’s something else, it’s for him.
— Dave Bry
Well, if you ask people with an affinity for Eastern philosophy, they might suggest that since we’re all essentially one anyway, temporary and contingent individuals made up of the same basic stuff, dependent on others for our existence and identity, there’s no conflict.
But I think it’s pretty well established that there are tremendous ingrained incentives for showing “selflessness” when it comes to your own children; after all, genetically speaking, they’re at least 50% identical to you. While we might think it’s a nice idea in theory, most of us will find some excuse not to carry a bunch of strangers around at the expense of our aching backs. And even people who do devote a substantial amount of their time and energy to helping other people in need are gaining the satisfaction of doing what they feel to be right, of trying to shape the world into what they’d like it to be. Socrates even felt that we are ultimately incapable of knowingly doing what we feel to be wrong, psychologically unable to know and wholeheartedly believe that something is the worst of available options, but choosing to do it anyway.
So I think his fourteen year-old self had it right when he was channeling Max Stirner: our self-interest, which encompasses our philosophical worldview as much as our immediate perceptions of pleasure and pain, is inextricably bound up in the choices we make. We have a name for people who exist purely to serve others, who perform actions for others’ benefit with no expectation of reward: slaves.
Jesus vs. Brian Wilson
I was talking recently with a liberal Christian, when the conversation turned to the Bible. At one point, I said that I didn’t see any value in trying to extract the “true” message of Jesus, given the contradictory verses that are purportedly his own words, not to mention the problem of trying to read the book as a coherent text written for the purpose of providing a historically accurate account of precisely what was done and said. He stuck to the party line, though, insisting that there is a common message of love to be found through the Gospels that takes primacy over any inconsistencies or disturbing passages. Anyway, that’s standard stuff. I then said that I personally didn’t find his words to be all that inspiring in the first place, to which his immediate, incredulous response was, “Not even the Beatitudes?”
In case you hellbound deviants don’t have them memorized, here’s a refresher:
Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are they who mourn,
for they shall be comforted.
Blessed are the meek,
for they shall inherit the earth.
Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they shall be satisfied.
Blessed are the merciful,
for they shall obtain mercy.
Blessed are the pure of heart,
for they shall see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they shall be called children of God.
Blessed are they who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
I said that I actually preferred the Beach Boys song, “Wouldn’t It Be Nice”:
Wouldn’t it be nice if we were olderThen we wouldn’t have to wait so longAnd wouldn’t it be nice to live togetherIn the kind of world where we belongYou know its gonna make it that much betterWhen we can say goodnight and stay togetherWouldn’t it be nice if we could wake upIn the morning when the day is newAnd after having spent the day togetherHold each other close the whole night throughThe happy times together we’ve been spendingI wish that every kiss was neverendingOh, wouldn’t it be nice…Maybe if we think and wish and hope and pray it might come trueBaby then there wouldn’t be a single thing we couldn’t doWe could be marriedAnd then we’d be happyWouldn’t it be nice…You know it seems the more we talk about itIt only makes it worse to live without itBut let’s talk about itOh, wouldn’t it be nice…
Same sappy, pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking, but with good music in this case. Did Jesus ever write any songs as brilliant as Brian Wilson? I rest my case.
I Will Not Mention Santayana, I Will Not
Take something everyone with half a brain and/or education knows to be true – evolution, say, or the fact that many of the most important Founders were more deist than Christian – and dispute it with fallacious reasoning “backed up” by a bunch of cherry-picked facts, if not outright lies. Then, demand a “serious discussion” about whether evolution is really real, or whether America was actually founded as a Christian nation.
The only proper responses to this, of course, are to laugh at it or ignore it. Anything else is a complete waste of time that could be better spent trying to grapple with the genuinely serious issues this country faces.
— Tristero
If you ask me (and even if you don’t), I’d say that one of the biggest wastes of time I know of is fruitlessly complaining about how things should be different than what they are. What makes this extra amusing to me is seeing how often progressives (rightly) delight in epicaricacy over the way Republicans seem determined to alienate Latinos, the largest minority group in the country, and the fastest growing. Uneducated people, though, can go get stuffed. We’re too busy with, uh, genuinely serious issues, like ineffectually boycotting upscale grocery stores, to bother trying to reach them.
This arrogant complacency about settled knowledge and accepted facts, though — see Roman Empire, Decline and Fall of, The. It took close to a thousand years for Europe to relearn, with a big assist from the Arabs, what the Greeks already knew. Knowledge is not cumulative. There is no guaranteed, orderly progression toward enlightenment. It’s only been a month since I last quoted this from John Gray, but it looks like I need to do it again:
In science, progress is a fact, in ethics and politics it is a superstition…Post-modern thinkers may question scientific progress, but it is undoubtedly real. The illusion is in the belief that it can effect any fundamental alteration in the human condition. The gains that have been achieved in ethics and politics are not cumulative. What has been gained can also be lost, and over time surely will be.
History is not an ascending spiral of human advance, or even an inch-by-inch crawl to a better world. It is an unending cycle in which changing knowledge interacts with unchanging human needs. Freedom is recurrently won and lost in an alternation that includes long periods of anarchy and tyranny, and there is no reason to suppose that this cycle will ever end. In fact, with human power increasing as a result of growing scientific knowledge, it can only become more violent.
The core of the idea of progress is that human life becomes better with the growth of knowledge. The error is not in thinking that human life can improve. Rather, it is in imagining that improvement can ever be cumulative. Unlike science, ethics and politics are not activities in which what is learnt in one generation can be passed on to an indefinite number of future generations. Like the arts, they are practical skills and can be easily lost.
Many Enlightenment thinkers accepted that scientific advance might slow down or stop, as in previous periods of history; and in that case social progress would stall as well…What none of the thinkers of the Enlightenment envisaged, and their followers today have failed to perceive, is that human life can become more savage and irrational even as scientific knowledge advances.
And that last line is especially important, because despite Tristero’s attempt to consign the whole phenomenon to irrelevance with a dismissive wave of his hand, there are tens of millions of Americans who get their information about the world from people like Glenn Beck. I should know; I’m related to some of them. They apparently didn’t get the memo that said they were expected to have intellectually progressed beyond the knowledge their provincial-minded, illiterate grandparents had. They never will as long as people who know better refuse to “waste time” telling them any different, insisting instead that they should, well, pull themselves up by their bootstraps somehow and figure everything out on their own.