But something profound is happening. Instead of smirking at religion, some of our most important philosophers, novelists, and public intellectuals are now reassessing their contempt for it. They are wondering if they might have missed something. Religion, the historian Niall Ferguson told me, “provides ethical immunity to the false religions of Lenin and Hitler.”
There is something inevitable about this reassessment, Jonathan Haidt, the prominent New York University psychologist and best-selling author, told me. (Haidt’s books include The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.) “There is a God-shaped hole in every human heart, and I believe it was put there by evolution,” he said. He was alluding to the seventeenth-century French philosopher Blaise Pascal, who wrote extensively on the nature of faith.
“We evolved in a long period of group versus group conflict and violence, and we evolved a capacity to make a sacred circle and then bind ourselves to others in a way that creates a strong community,” Haidt told me.
When Savodnik contacted me a while back, he said he was writing an article about prominent secular intellectuals turning toward religion, and he wanted to know if I, an important philosopher and public intellectual, had any thoughts about it. I replied:

He sighed, and asked if I’d mind elaborating. Well, I said, no offense, but journalists are no better than marketing executives, and as such, I don’t take their proclamations seriously, whether the hot new thing is religion or those Stanley tumblers that people were fighting over in the aisles of Target. The media exists to create ephemeral narratives in a desperate attempt to stave off an unguarded moment of crushing self-awareness, and this one will soon be replaced by the next. Life will continue on much as it has. I don’t think there will be any significant return to that old-time religion, but if Crawford, Ferguson, and Hirsi Ali are satisfied with their new Christian outlook on life, good for them. As for me, I don’t feel like I’m lacking meaning, I still don’t believe in deities or immortal souls, and even if I calculate in utilitarian fashion that church attendance is a better thing for society overall than social justice activism, I think it would be a patronizing insult to go through the motions myself as a “faitheist.” As always, whatever the current enthusiasm, I just ask to be left out of it.
I see my remarks didn’t make the published article.
